One of the most common factual errors that is perpetuated within the left end of the political spectrum in the United States of America is the lumping of fascist Italy's "corporate rule" with the idea that the USA, instead of being a democracy, is actually ruled by corporate power. Hopefully, whether you agree or not, you know what is meant by corporate rule in the U.S.A. I want to clarify what was meant by corporate rule in Italy during the dictatorship of Benito Mussolini.
First some historical background. Benito Mussolini's father is described as an anarchist or socialist. Having a leg up in that culture, Benito became the editor of the leading Socialist Party newspaper at an early age. When World War I broke out Benito abandonned the internationalism of his party for Italian nationalism. Like Lenin and the Communists in Russia, he also abandonned the democratic ideals of the anarchists and socialists. He took the nationalists among the Socialists with him; they became the core of the Fascist Party. They attracted many ex-soldiers but also workers, peasants, and owners of small businesses to their cause. The early Fascist program included a tax on capital, land redistribution to peasants, and nationalization of industry. In other words the Fascists began as a socialist party with a nationalist agenda.
After seizing power the Fascists suppressed those who opposed them and set up a totalitarian society with a strong centralized state. Mussolini's Corporate State theory was not about putting Italian corporate businessmen in charge. Rather it had its historical roots in Syndicalism, which is a kind of anarchism or socialism that advocates that workers own and control the industries where they work. Instead of basing representation on geographic areas, syndicalists believed in representation by industry. So all the health care workers would have a delegate in a national assembly, all the steel workers, etc.
Mussolini turned this idea upside down. Instead of workers gaining control of industry and forming a government based on syndicates, a strong central government organized society in corporations that corresponded to industries. The state would dictate to corporations created by the state to control industry and its workers.
An essay written at the time by Royston Pike, Dictators Who Walk the European Stage (in Universal World History, Volume 10, page 3025) sums it up nicely, once you know the background:
"Masters and men have been formed into twenty-two Corporations which are responsible for the direction of the country's economic organization. From these Corporations the M.P.s [Members of Parliament] of the future will be drawn; thus representation will be functional and not geographical as in democratic countries. A man will be represented in the government machine because he is an engineer or a jounalist and not because he lives in Rome or Naples. Thus we have the "Corporate State," Fascism's outstanding contribution to the body of the world's political theory and practice."
1/1/2007 1:05 PMKirsten wrote:
This is most interesting. Thank you to the author. Who IS the author, by the way?
1/5/2007 10:52 AM
Jan Edwards wrote:
Yes!Wikipedia says the famous quote from Mussolini is a hoax: "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini Your piece is a good short overview of Italian Facism and this often misused concept that US style corporatism is the same as facism.
5/15/2007 11:46 AM
Ron H wrote:
I am guilty of lumping the corporate state of fascist Italy with the corporate rule in America not because of a lack of knowledge of structure but because of the similarities of characteristics that all forms of fascism share. Perhaps we can come close to agreement by stating that not all fascism is corporate but certainly all corporate entities demonstrate fascist like propensities.
3/23/2009 7:19 PM
Wang wrote:
Speaking of Barack Obama: LONG LIVE EMPEROR OBAMA!
Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably condemns racism:
There is bad news about George Herbert Walker Bush.
What if basically all racial-minority people would subscribe to the interpretations that George Herbert Walker Bush committed monstrous, racist, hate crimes while he was the President of the United States?
It will eventually come out: it is only a matter of time.
Respectfully Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang, J.D. Candidate B.S., With the Highest Level of Academic Honors at Graduation, 1996 Messiah College, Grantham, PA Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993
(I can type 90 words per minute, and there are thousands of copies on the Internet indicating the content of this post. And there are at least hundreds of copies in very many countries around the world.) _________________ “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Off the top of my head—it came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.
Leave a comment
Comments are closed.
Copyright . http://BLOG.CALIFORNIADEMOCRACY.ORG. All rights reserved.